• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Microcontroller Tips

Microcontroller engineering resources, new microcontroller products and electronics engineering news

  • Products
    • 8-bit
    • 16-bit
    • 32-bit
    • 64-bit
  • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Connectivity
    • Consumer Electronics
    • Industrial
    • Medical
    • Security
  • EE Forums
    • EDABoard.com
    • Electro-Tech-Online.com
  • Videos
    • TI Microcontroller Videos
  • EE Resources
    • DesignFast
    • eBooks / Tech Tips
    • FAQs
    • LEAP Awards
    • Podcasts
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • EE Learning Center
    • Design Guides
      • WiFi & the IOT Design Guide
      • Microcontrollers Design Guide
      • State of the Art Inductors Design Guide

The Iridium global satcom system, Part 2: The implementation

November 4, 2020 By Bill Schweber

This worldwide satellite-based communications system went from dream to reality in a decade but quickly failed in the market; its revival took persistence and luck, plus a new customer base.

The first part of the article explained the inspiration and rationale for the Iridium system. Three major elements were required to make the Iridium concept and dream – and it was truly a dream – into reality:

Figure 1: The six polar orbits of the Iridium system show how its orbital planes provide complete coverage of the Earth’s surface. (Image: University of Colorado/Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research)

1) A global constellation of 66 satellites (plus about half a dozen or more “spares”), but not in the usual geosynchronous orbits or even low-altitude, low- propagation-delay orbits. Instead, polar orbits would be used for 100% Earth coverage (Figure 1). The original calculations showed that 77 such satellites would be needed (plus spares), so the system was named after element 77 on the periodic table (subsequent analysis showed that just 66 satellites were needed, but the re-naming it Dysprosium for the 66th element was rejected). The satellites were arranged in six orbital planes of 11 satellites each and inclined at 86.4°, just a few degrees off a perfect north-south axis; these orbital planes criss-cross at each pole. At the height of 485 miles (781 km), each satellite orbits every 100 minutes, with a round-trip Earth-satellite link propagation delay of 5 msec, which is very acceptable for two-way speech.

These satellites were not just simple connecting points for one-hop, Earth-based connections between users. Instead, they were orbiting MTSOs which could dynamically link and unlink via the Ka microwave band (26.5 to 40 GHz) to any of four adjacent satellites: the ones immediately before and after in the same orbital plane, as well as the closest ones in adjacent planes (Figure 2). A call in progress might go through one, two, or more satellites and be handed off as the satellites orbited; these handoffs would occur every minute for a given call connection. As a result, a call’s link delay was just the 5 msec plus the satellite-to-satellite link delay of another few milliseconds, far less than the geosynchronous link with its 240-msec hop delay.

Figure 2: The satellites (green boxes) and their polar orbits (red lines) show the overlapping footprints of coverage each satellite provides as it illuminates a circular area of the Earth’s surface. (Image: SaVi satellite constellation visualization)

The fabric topology and software needed to make this work were unlike anything orbited. The processing and routing demands were stringent, yet available power was limited to the solar panels. The first-generation designs measured about 4 meters by 1.8 meters, weighed 689 kilograms (1,519 lb) with innovative antennas for communicating with ground stations as well as adjacent satellites (Figure 3). Due to the low orbits, the satellites were in Earth-circling radiation belts and needed radiation-hardened components, yet still would have reduced life.

2) Satellites alone were only part of the overall plan. Earth-based stations called gateways were needed to link to the 66 satellites and to each other, to complete the system management and fabric, and also link to the terrestrial phone network. These gateways (there were roughly two dozen), would be located around the globe, in countries that had a technology base and some that had nearly none.

The software needed to link these gateways and manage them in real-time, along with the actual links between them, was another high-risk challenge. Communication between satellites and earth stations used 30 GHz for the uplink and 20 GHz for the downlink. Some gateways were owned by the hosting country, while others were owned and operated by a private licensee in that country, with the government’s official approval. Overall system management was done by a dedicated Satellite Network Operating Center (SNOC) facility—also a major undertaking.

Figure 3: An Iridium satellite has standard solar panels for power but also carries two different sets of antennas: one for the ground up/downlink (above); the other for the link to adjacent satellites (below). (Image: Smithsonian Institution/National Air & Space Museum, PhoneIsMobile.com )

 

3) Finally, handsets had to be provided so users could actually contact the satellite constellation. Motorola contracted with several handset vendors, including Kyocera and their own handset group, to design and build these. The first units were relatively large and bulky (3 pounds), and priced at several thousand dollars, and subsequent units have shrunk considerably in size, weight and cost, and are now close but not quite to the parameters of concurrent, mass-market standard cell phones (Figure 4). Iridium phones have an unusual external antenna, which is a technical necessity for linking to the satellites. Some of the phones can even connect to a small, separate, domed-shaped antenna for a better signal.

Making it happen

The technical challenges across all three aspects – satellites, gateways, and handsets – were enormous, obviously. The design teams had to devise new topologies for these unique mesh networks, new algorithms for call handling and handoff, new RF designs including antennas, and make it all fit into the modest-size package.

Unlike conventional communications satellites, where each one is uniquely designed, built, and launched, a large number of Iridium satellites mandated a “mass production” approach. The idea was to build identical satellites in clusters of ten or more while only incorporating any changes in subsequent batches if there was a demonstrable benefit. Thus, Iridium standardized the satellites to the extent possible, which was a radical approach.

Figure 4: A fourth-generation handset, the model 9555 Iridium satellite phone handles voice and data; it is shown with its antenna extended for use. (Image: Iridium Communications Inc. via PhoneIsMobile.com)

The launches would be done from sites across the globe, including China, French Guyana, and the Soviet Union (before the breakup), using contracted services. A typical rocket would include at least six satellites, and sometimes up to a dozen, to save time and cost. While this provided many operational advantages, it also added risk, as when a rocket exploded or failed to orbit. The entire multi-satellite payload was lost (which happened several times).

While building identical units is not “mass-production” in the consumer-product world, it very much was for satellites, which, until that point, were unique, no-two-alike units. Note that the mass-production concept is now widely used, with the multiple satellite load and launch of hundreds and thousands of relatively small satellites (about 500 pounds/225 kilograms)  in the StarLink system from SpaceX.

The other side of getting Iridium “off the ground” had little to do with technology and everything to do with spectrum assignment, regulatory issues, and global reach. The Motorola-driven Iridium system had to get some specific spectrum allocations from the International Telecommunication Union (ITU – the United Nations specialized agency for information and communication technologies) at its biannual meeting of over 100 countries, and also get license agreements with the countries that would host the gateways. Both allocation and agreements became extremely time-consuming and bureaucratic battles, as countries objected for security, financial, and political reasons.

In the end, what solved both the spectrum and gateway problems was a combination of Motorola’s long-standing relationships with key people in many of the countries, as well as promises and guarantees to gateway operators and their governments (and many rumors of “shady” payments and more). As a highly respected vendor for decades, Motorola’s local agents were able to actually call on key government ministries and officials, get their attention, and work out needed agreements.

The next part describes how Iridium soon failed as a business and how it came back from the nearly dead.

EE World Content

Iridium Satellite Connectivity Added to Versatile ConnectPort X5 R Rugged Gateway
DeLorme Unveils Plans for Iridium-Based Two-Way Satellite Communicator
Basics of GPS receivers
GPS, Part 2: Implementation
GPS, Part 1: Basic principles

External References

  1. “Eccentric Orbits: The Iridium Story,” John Bloom, Atlantic Monthly Press, 2016.
  2. “Iridium Will Host Science Payloads,” IEEE Spectrum, Nov. 30, 2009
  3. “The Collision of Iridium 33 and Cosmos 2251,”Aerospace, December 10, 2015
  4. “A guide to useful, useless, official, and unofficial Iridium websites.”
  5. “The Rise and Fall and Rise of Iridium,” Air & Space Magazine, September 2004
  6. “Iridium ends legacy satellite service, switches all traffic to Next fleet,” Space News, February 2019
  7. “SpaceX completes Iridium Next constellation,” Space News, January 11, 2019
  8. “Iridium starting to deorbit legacy satellites as Next constellation comes online,” Space News, May 1, 2017
  9. “Elon Musk’s Ambitious Communication Project to Ring Earth with 40,000 Satellites,” News18, Sept 19, 2020
  10. Wikipedia, “Starlink”
  11. “Starlink: SpaceX’s satellite internet project,” com, January 17, 2020
  12. Thales Group, “Happy Birthday Iridium Next,” January 14, 2020
  13. PhoneIsMobile, “Iridium Satellite Phone”
  14. Wikipedia, “Iridium satellite constellation.”
  15. Wikipedia, “Inmarsat”
  16. Wikipedia, “Thuraya”
  17. Wikipedia, “Globalstar”

You may also like:

  • iridium
    The Iridium global satcom system, Part 3: Very nearly crash…

  • Iridium global satcom system: Brilliant design, terrible business, last-minute reprieve,…

  • eLORAN a terrestrial alternative to GPS

  • GPS is a ubiquitous and problematic technology

  • Basics of GPS receivers

Filed Under: Aerospace and Defense, Applications, FAQ, Featured, Telecommunications, Wireless Tagged With: FAQ

Primary Sidebar

DesignFast

Design Fast Logo
Component Selection Made Simple.

Try it Today
design fast globle

EE Training Center Classrooms

EE Classrooms

CURRENT DIGITAL ISSUE

A frequency you can count on There are few constants in life, but what few there are might include death, taxes, and a U.S. grid frequency that doesn’t vary by more than ±0.5 Hz. However, the certainty of the grid frequency is coming into question, thanks to the rising percentage of renewable energy sources that…

Digital Edition Back Issues

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Subscribe to weekly industry news, new product innovations and more.

Subscribe today

RSS Current EDABoard.com discussions

  • Advice for my disabled son please
  • Very low voltage/power Schmitt trigger?
  • 3D IC Design: Is it possible to stack CPU and FPGA?
  • dc to dc converter sparks when inserting fuse
  • 7 segment display connections

RSS Current Electro-Tech-Online.com Discussions

  • Pet Microchip scan
  • Disabled son needs advice please
  • Modify a digital clamp ammeter ?
  • Confirming whether this circuit will work
  • How does a blinky/flashing ball work?

Footer

Microcontroller Tips

EE World Online Network

  • DesignFast
  • EE World Online
  • EDA Board Forums
  • Electro Tech Online Forums
  • Connector Tips
  • Analog IC Tips
  • Power Electronic Tips
  • Sensor Tips
  • Test and Measurement Tips
  • Wire and Cable Tips
  • 5G Technology World

Microcontroller Tips

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
  • About us
Follow us on Twitter Add us on Facebook Follow us on YouTube  Follow us on Instagram

Copyright © 2022 · WTWH Media LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media.

Privacy Policy